Open source, all of it. The sources, the criteria, the argument, the case against the argument, and the prompts. github.com/debedb/elephants →

What the US government said about COVID-19 vaccines and transmission

Origins: the hypotheses, and what they were called → ← COVID-19: a sourced timeline Shoshin: a beginner's mind updates on this record →

The claim moved: from "data are limited" at authorization, to "you're not going to get COVID", to "vaccinated people infected with Delta can transmit the virus", to guidance that stopped distinguishing the vaccinated from everyone else. Each step below is a federal document or transcript, quoted in its own words.

All of this is open source. Not just the data — the argument. Nothing about how this page was made is withheld, because an argument you cannot audit is worth less than one you can:

Disagreement is settled the way open source settles anything: in public, as a change to the thing itself, which is either merged or refused on the record.

The process and the prompts This page's source The repository

Only .gov sources on this page. Every row links to something published by the United States government: an FDA review memorandum, a CDC media statement, an MMWR report, a White House transcript. There is no journalism here, no commentary, and no analysis of either. Where an official said something on television, it is out — see "Sought, and not included" below for what that rule cost us.

The most quoted line in this whole argument is missing, on purpose. On 29 March 2021 the CDC Director said of vaccinated people that "they don't get sick" and "do not carry the virus". She said it on MSNBC. It is not a government publication, so it is not on this page, even though it is the single most useful quotation for the argument we are making. That is the rule doing its job rather than us doing ours.

The horizontal axis is time. The vertical axis carries no magnitude and no ranking. Rows are stacked in date order so that every document has a place to sit where you can see and click its citation.

Quotations are verbatim and were read out of the linked document, not out of an article about it. Ellipses mark omitted words; nothing else is altered.

Our voice appears in two places only: which statements share this axis, and the lines marked "our call". The argument they add up to is stated below, in its own section, so you can argue with it instead of inferring it.

The argument, stated plainly

This is ours, and it is the only claim on the page that is. The strongest public assurances were made in the window when the government's own documents did not support them, and they were withdrawn without ever being retracted as claims. The FDA said at authorization that transmission data were limited. Fourteen weeks later the CDC reported a real reduction in infection and framed it as preventing spread. Three months after that a President told a televised audience that vaccinated people were not going to get COVID at all. Six days later the CDC told vaccinated people to put masks back on indoors, and three days after that its Director said in writing that vaccinated people infected with Delta can transmit the virus. By August 2022 the guidance no longer distinguished the vaccinated from anyone else.

Every one of those steps is defensible on its own. The claim is about the sequence: the confidence of the public message ran ahead of the evidence in the government's own files, and the correction arrived as a guidance change rather than as a correction.

The strongest objections to it

These are not strawmen. If we lose the argument, we expect to lose it on one of these.

Sought, and not included

Three things belong in this story that are not on the axis above. The rule this page set for itself excluded them, and publishing the exclusions is the only way that rule means anything.

How to argue with this page

You don't have to persuade us. Everything here — every date, every quotation, every word of the argument above — sits in a single public file that anyone is allowed to edit. You change what you think is wrong and send us your version. We either accept it, publicly, or we have to say publicly why not.

And if you'd rather not argue with us at all, take the whole thing. You are free to make a complete copy of this page and publish your own version under your own name, with different documents and a different conclusion. You need nobody's permission. Send us yours and we will link to it from here.

See the file everything lives in Send us a change Take your own copy Or just tell us what's wrong

All statements

DateStatementKindSource